Welcome to the Inert Ordnance Collectors.
  • Login:
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    416
    Images
    38
    Thanks
    181
    Thanked 112 Times in 69 Posts

    PTAB designation



    what is the proper designation for this submunition? I've seen it variously described as 'PTAB 2.5', 'PTAB 2.5KO', 'PTAB 2.5 kilo', 'PTAB 85' or simply 'PTAB'... unsure as to which is correct, or if indeed PTAB refers to the entire weapon system (canister and bomblets) rather than just the submunition?? PTAB could also refer to the family of weapons developed from WW2 rather than specific model?

    I have also read that there are two variants of this one pictured above, differing in the length of the tail?
    always looking for inert baton rounds and accessories - please message me if you have any for sale/trade.

  2. #2
    Ordnance Approved
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    2,002
    Thanks
    2,407
    Thanked 729 Times in 394 Posts
    Following US TM-T-35-2-11, designation is PTAB 2,5 KO


    Yoda
    Any live or dug ordnance presented by me has been disposed of by EOD technicians.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Yodamaster For This Useful Post:

    batonroundcollector (23rd September 2020)

  4. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Somewhere
    Posts
    261
    Thanks
    70
    Thanked 219 Times in 132 Posts
    It should be, in English, PTAB-2.5KO. In Russian ПТАБ-2,5КО. Russia uses a comma to denote the decimal point.

    PTAB is an acronym of Protivotankovaya Aviatsionnaya Bomba (Противотанковая Авиационная Бомба), so literally in English, Anti-tank Aerial Bomb. The 'K' is presumably short for Kumulyatyvnaya (Кумулятивная), aka a shaped charge, whilst the 'O' is short for 'Oskolochno' (Осколочно), aka fragmenting.

    As per most Russian bombs, the 2.5 (2,5) bit is its weight class in kg. The additional numbers after the PTAB-2.5 bit, if present, normally means its actual nominal weight in kg.

  5. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Eggburt1969 For This Useful Post:

    batonroundcollector (23rd September 2020), HAZORD (23rd September 2020), Lostround (23rd September 2020)

  6. #4
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    416
    Images
    38
    Thanks
    181
    Thanked 112 Times in 69 Posts
    Great answers, thanks guys just ordered an inert late-‘80s dated one... is there anywhere I can read more about these - variants, how they were used, operational history etc?
    always looking for inert baton rounds and accessories - please message me if you have any for sale/trade.

  7. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Somewhere
    Posts
    261
    Thanks
    70
    Thanked 219 Times in 132 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by batonroundcollector View Post
    Great answers, thanks guys just ordered an inert late-‘80s dated one... is there anywhere I can read more about these - variants, how they were used, operational history etc?

    In English, there's not much out there. In Russian, there's quite a lot. Most of the material I have is in Russian.

    Where I work I have processed the PTAB-2.5M and its AV-524M (АВ-524М) fuze, but the I haven't rewritten the PTAB-2.5KO, or other PTAB entries yet.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Eggburt1969 For This Useful Post:

    batonroundcollector (23rd September 2020)

  9. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Spain / Germany
    Posts
    406
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 484 Times in 247 Posts
    This is what i have in english about the PTAB-2.5KO.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to rigby For This Useful Post:

    batonroundcollector (23rd September 2020)

  11. #7
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    416
    Images
    38
    Thanks
    181
    Thanked 112 Times in 69 Posts
    Thanks again so this has a hollow charge... I’m guessing then it was indicated against massed armour (of the kind maybe encountered in WW2 and expected in a conflict with NATO), and perhaps against runways etc, or not? There is mention in info of fragmentation (‘FRAG’), but this wasn’t an anti-personnel system, right, at least not by design?
    Last edited by batonroundcollector; 23rd September 2020 at 05:34 PM.
    always looking for inert baton rounds and accessories - please message me if you have any for sale/trade.

  12. #8
    ORDNANCE APPROVED/Premium Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Michigan - US
    Posts
    3,997
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 4,029 Times in 1,164 Posts
    More towards light armor and support equipment. The shaped charge is not enough to do serious damage to a MBT, but APCs, rocket launchers, parked aircraft, fuel and ammo resupply areas. It would do no appreciable damage to a runway. This was a later design of the PTAB family, more of a combined effects approach without the incendiary pellet.
    All dug or live ordnance shown in my posts is under EOD control and has been or will be dealt with accordingly by EOD personnel

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to US-Subs For This Useful Post:

    batonroundcollector (23rd September 2020)

  14. #9
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    416
    Images
    38
    Thanks
    181
    Thanked 112 Times in 69 Posts
    thanks... so these were dropped in canisters by ground attack aircraft, and helicopters? would they detonate on soft ground, or only on hard surface?

    seen a 'PTAB 2.5M' in photos - is that is the latest iteration/replacement for the -2.5KO then?

    sorry a lot of questions but just got interested in these, don't know a whole lot about submunitions... just thought the ones I saw listed for sale looked 'cool'
    always looking for inert baton rounds and accessories - please message me if you have any for sale/trade.

  15. #10
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Ukraine
    Posts
    661
    Thanks
    346
    Thanked 379 Times in 177 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Eggburt1969 View Post
    PTAB is an acronym of Protivotankovaya Aviatsionnaya Bomba (Противотанковая Авиационная Бомба), so literally in English, Anti-tank Aerial Bomb. The 'K' is presumably short for Kumulyatyvnaya (Кумулятивная), aka a shaped charge, whilst the 'O' is short for 'Oskolochno' (Осколочно), aka fragmenting.
    KO is Kumulyativno-Oskolochnaya (Кумулятивно-Осколочная)
    Осколочно is incorrect on Russian. If OK - Oskolochno-Kumulyativnaya, then Осколочно-Кумулятивная and you destignation is correct on Russian too.

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top