Welcome to the Inert Ordnance WW1, WW2 | information,sales,wanted,photos,forum and more.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Lucky .303 find

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,772
    Thanks
    Thanked 104 Times in 75 Posts

    Lucky .303 find

    Although the .303 ball Mark VII is always known as having a 174 grain bullet, the original Mark VII adopted in March 1910 had a 160 grain bullet. The earlier bullet had a longer aluminium tip filler and no cannelure.

    In August 1910 a newly made batch failed accuracy proof and production was suspended. A new design to RL 17069 was adopted and approved in November 1910 as the now familiar 174 grn bullet. The Mark VII designation was not advanced, probably to avoid embarrassing questions in the press and parliament.

    Yesterday I pulled a Greenwood & Batley 1913 dated Mark VII for a totally different reason and to my delight found an uncannelured bullet. Weighing confirmed it was a 160 grain bullet, and even better the base was stamped "GB 7".

    Although this is after the introduction of the 174 grain bullet, it seems G & B used up stocks on hand of the 160 grain. I knew from someone else that these G & B 160 grain loads existed but this is the first one I have found.

    Regards
    TonyE
    Attached Images
    Researcher, collector and pedant
    British military small arms and ammunition.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    761
    Images
    16
    Thanks
    Thanked 15 Times in 8 Posts

    Talking

    Nice find Tony.

    Any way to tell if a 303 has the 160gr bullet without pulling it?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Andover, Hants, England
    Posts
    1,585
    Images
    797
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    Thanked 61 Times in 53 Posts
    Nice find TonyE,
    do you have any ideas about this double cannelure one? I have no idea from what case it came from as it is a pick up from a WW2 pre D-day live firing practice site.
    It is 'silver' colour,reluctant to use CN to discribe it as it has no magnetic attraction at all.

    Cheers
    Tony
    "Si vis pacem,para bellum"

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Andover, Hants, England
    Posts
    1,585
    Images
    797
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    Thanked 61 Times in 53 Posts
    oh bum! here is photo's
    Attached Images
    "Si vis pacem,para bellum"

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Suffolk
    Posts
    1,090
    Images
    7
    Thanks
    Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
    Hi Tony, is this any help mine is made by Winchester in 1915 could yours be the same?
    cheers
    Andy
    Attached Images

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,772
    Thanks
    Thanked 104 Times in 75 Posts

    Double cannelures

    Many of the US made .303 bullets have double cannelures. I wonder if this is so that the bullets could either be loaded at the US factory where they used a coned mouth crimp, or supplied to British/Canadian factories where they used the lower 3 x 120 degree slit neck crimp.

    That is purely conjecture and I have not found any confirmation.

    BTW, cupro-nickel (CN) will not attract a magnet. Only cupro-nickel clad steel (CNCS) will do that. You bullet is CN.

    MissingSomething - the only way other than pulling it is to weigh it. The normal 174 grain loaded round is in the range 395 -400 grains usually, depending on the manufacturer. The 160 grain round will come in at about 380-385 grains.

    The G13 one I found weighed in at 381 grains.

    Regards
    TonyE
    Researcher, collector and pedant
    British military small arms and ammunition.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Andover, Hants, England
    Posts
    1,585
    Images
    797
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    Thanked 61 Times in 53 Posts
    Hi TonyE and Andy,
    wasn't the U.S. manufactured bullets shorter,because of no tip 'filler' being used and to keep the weight the same?
    Photo of same bullet with a 1915 KN on the left and a 1942 WRA on the right

    Cheers
    Tony
    Attached Images
    "Si vis pacem,para bellum"

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,772
    Thanks
    Thanked 104 Times in 75 Posts

    US made .303

    That is certainly true of WW2 US production, but I am less sure about WWI. I have a feeling that some WWI US production utilised the normal construction. I will see if I have any spare WWI projs and get the saw out!

    Cheers
    TonyE
    Researcher, collector and pedant
    British military small arms and ammunition.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Andover, Hants, England
    Posts
    1,585
    Images
    797
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    Thanked 61 Times in 53 Posts
    That is intresting and things are starting to fit together nicely,I have reserched this site and it was only used for live firing exercises during WW2,but I have found evidence that 'old' stock/reserve ammunition was used on this site as I have found a small number of MkII/V .303" bullets also.
    I have located one firing point on this site but only found mid to late 30's British MkVII and one later(SR 1942) MkVIII .303" case's,as this site is in a valley and because of nature of 'spread' of spent projectiles it would seem there would have been several firing points(yet to find! and have a spare day on Thursday!!!).
    I think Andy may have hit the nail on the head first time!
    Will keep you informed if I 'turn up' another firing point.

    Cheers
    Tony
    "Si vis pacem,para bellum"


 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts