Welcome to the Inert Ordnance WW1, WW2 | information,sales,wanted,photos,forum and more.
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    136
    Thanks
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Underwater velocity aircraft bomb

    When a aircraft bomb (500 or 1000 lb.) is dropped in the water, the velocity will decrease rapidly. Will such a bomb, dropped from a Hawker Typhoon dive bomber penetrate the bottom of a canal with 4,00 – 4,50 meter of water?


    Greetings - Antoon

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,042
    Images
    6
    Thanks
    Thanked 137 Times in 71 Posts
    Just read this one and can say I have no idea about velocity in water, however if you think of the depths that bombs penetrated soil then I wouldnt think that 4 and a half meters of water would be enough to prevent a bomb of that size penetrating the canal floor. Of course it would depend also on the angle at which the bomb hit the water too.

    just my thoughts....

    look forward to reading other, more educated comments!!!

    regards Kev

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Michigan - US
    Posts
    1,747
    Thanks
    Thanked 175 Times in 105 Posts
    I would expect so, expecially considering the soft bottom of most inland waterways. If you were to release it with no velocity, just from the surface, you would expect a fair amount of penetration. Now add any velocity, decreased or not, and you will increase your penetration.

    Talk to an engineer and give him your measurements to figure drag of the bomb and he should be able to give you a % of velocity drop for that depth.
    All dug or live ordnance shown in my posts is under EOD control and has been or will be dealt with accordingly by EOD personnel

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,807
    Thanks
    Thanked 185 Times in 95 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Antoon View Post
    When a aircraft bomb (500 or 1000 lb.) is dropped in the water, the velocity will decrease rapidly. Will such a bomb, dropped from a Hawker Typhoon dive bomber penetrate the bottom of a canal with 4,00 – 4,50 meter of water?


    Greetings - Antoon
    I suppose it depends how thick the bottom of the canal is..........
    Dave.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Lancashire,England
    Posts
    5,935
    Images
    8
    Thanks
    Thanked 25 Times in 21 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by SG500 View Post
    I suppose it depends how thick the bottom of the canal is..........
    Dave.
    Plus height from which said bomb is dropped? Could be opening a can of worms here!

    best

    waffy
    Waffenamt.
    Collector of German ww2 Bomb fuzes and Ordnance.
    'The early bird catches the worm!...'

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    289
    Thanks
    Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
    If the bombs were dropped at 400mph at low level, then there would be significant residual kinetic energy when they entered the water.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    978
    Thanks
    Thanked 120 Times in 93 Posts
    Also it would matter if the bomb used was designed for this purpose.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Bletchley, Milton Keynes
    Posts
    230
    Thanks
    Thanked 13 Times in 7 Posts
    Not forgetting, that all going well most impact fuzes will operate on contact with the water (sudden deceleration) and detonation will occur before bomb gets to bottom even with delay.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    519
    Images
    13
    Thanks
    Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
    It seems that the surface impact speed has little bearing on the overall horizontal trajectory, but the "Angle of Attack" (AOA) has a larger effect:

    http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc...f&AD=ADA530592

    Interesting point re using an impact fuse............I wondered why the Clark Naval anti-submarine /ship Bomb fuze (c 1915) had a very short production life as it had both an impact mechanism (striking the ship's deck) and a mechanical delay mechanism to explode at a set depth against the ship's side - if it missed the deck..................wasn't reliable!

    Cheers
    Drew

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ohio, US of A.
    Posts
    1,360
    Images
    6
    Thanks
    Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
    Wouldn't the size and what type the fins are. I think that if you use the boxed fins, it may skip a few times. I believe the "Fat Boy" atomic bomb missed the target by a mile or so. The did some tests and figured out somehow that one of the fins inside the box became bent making the bomb go off course? Anybody know if this is right on both accounts?
    V40
    Mark
    MACVSOG Living Historian"
    SOG weaponery and Ordnance Historian

    any live ordnance shown in my posts was dealt with accordingly by trained qualified professionals

    "Never start a fight that you can't win with everything you have right now" By Sergeant Joe Walker, 10 (One-Zero) of RT California, Vietnam.


 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •