Welcome to the Inert Ordnance WW1, WW2 | information,sales,wanted,photos,forum and more.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    maryland
    Posts
    549
    Thanks
    Thanked 58 Times in 21 Posts

    M632 105-MM CS projectile

    Does anyone have a M632 projectile or M632 105-MM CS cartridge (the cartridge contains the M632 projectile) they can take pictures of? I am in the process of updating this publication, and would like to get some real images of this item if possible.

    Thanks,

    Joe

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    325
    Images
    2
    Thanks
    Thanked 44 Times in 21 Posts
    Joe
    Don't know if this will help

    D2442UP001.jpg

    not a very good picture

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    maryland
    Posts
    549
    Thanks
    Thanked 58 Times in 21 Posts
    Its better than the simple line drawinhg I have now. I might be able to do some cleaning up of it with my graphics people.

    Thanks

    Joe

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    1,979
    Thanks
    Thanked 102 Times in 67 Posts
    I have an unfired one. I won't be able to photo it till tonight.
    ___HAZ/
    _____/ORD Hazardous Ordnance Recognition
    ________Saving Lives Through Education

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    325
    Images
    2
    Thanks
    Thanked 44 Times in 21 Posts
    Joe
    Here's a rather clear cut away dwg of the round
    Don't know what help it will be


    D2442U02.jpg

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    1,979
    Thanks
    Thanked 102 Times in 67 Posts
    Some photos of my 105H XM-629 TAC-CS cartridge that uses an XM-632 projo body. Shown with an ILLUM and BE smoke to show the tighter radius of ogive on the ILLUM and TAC-CS compared to the larger radius of ogive (more tapered) on the rest of the 105 Howitzer family. The Illum and TAC-CS are very recognizeable by their ogive design. I'm puzzled as to why the weight zone markings were stamped in 90 degrees clockwise from the rest of the lettering. You will notice that the illum cartridge is an M314A3 and the projectile is an M314A3. I guess keeping the same number for cartridge and projo body on the TAC-CS would have been too simple.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by HAZORD; 1st February 2012 at 11:06 AM.
    ___HAZ/
    _____/ORD Hazardous Ordnance Recognition
    ________Saving Lives Through Education

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to HAZORD For This Useful Post:

    jvollenberg (1st February 2012), peteblight (13th March 2012)

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    419
    Thanks
    Thanked 26 Times in 13 Posts
    Great pictures, do you have an example of the 155mm Projo?

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    1,979
    Thanks
    Thanked 102 Times in 67 Posts
    Pete,

    Here is the XM-631 155H projo. It is fired and I repainted it about 30 years ago. It is 23-3/8 inches tall without base plate or fuze. The base plate will add about 5/16 to 3/8 more.

    It is shown with the 105H XM-629 projo above, which is just under 14-7/8 inches tall without base plate or fuze, and also shown with the 66mm CS rocket which is 20 inches long.

    The 155mm projo appears to be identical in design to the 155mm M-485 ILLUM. It takes a 2 inch fuze and the base is press fit in and pinned the same as the ILLUM. BE smoke projectiles of this caliber typically have a screw in baseplate and take the smaller diameter 1.4 inch time fuze.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    ___HAZ/
    _____/ORD Hazardous Ordnance Recognition
    ________Saving Lives Through Education

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to HAZORD For This Useful Post:

    jvollenberg (13th March 2012), Pascal (13th March 2012), peteblight (13th March 2012)

  11. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    419
    Thanks
    Thanked 26 Times in 13 Posts
    John,

    Thanks for this, just what i needed.
    Is the rocket the XM96?

    Cheers

    Pete

  12. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    419
    Thanks
    Thanked 26 Times in 13 Posts
    One more thing, do you have decent pictures of the CS canisters that they ejected?

    Cheers

    Pete


 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •