Welcome to the Inert Ordnance Collectors.
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Southampton, UK
    Posts
    366
    Images
    83
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 46 Times in 14 Posts

    Russian 100mm AP - Identification

    Hi - Can anyone help identify this projectile I picked up at Detling more precisely. There are no markings but it is definitely 100mm dia

    As far as I can tell its a Russian BR-412 and definitely not a BR-412B or BR-412D variants both of which "appear" more modern.
    I don't believe the suffixes used on Russian rounds incremented in the same way we'd expect a MK no to on British and UK rounds, and I'm also no master of the cyrillic alphabet.

    If this is a BR-412 projectile, does that make it WW2 dated, does anyone know if there was a variant before the BR-412B (Presumably A?), and when these rounds came into service.

    My skepticism about this being war dated is the complexity of the drive band - but I do seem to recall seeing a photo somewhere of a line up of Russian rounds, and the 100mm was like this, the others all had simple flat profiles


    Russian 100mm.jpg

    Cheers
    Rich

    (The round is of course a completely inert lump of slightly pitted metal)

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to RichardB For This Useful Post:

    rcaf53 (12th September 2012)

  3. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    271
    Thanks
    62
    Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
    Hy Rich,

    this is a 100mm BR-412 projectile.
    As I know, product started at 1944.
    If this is a WW2 made projectile, so you are very lucky, becuase this is really rare (in my opinion). And very rare in this nice condition!

  4. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,786
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 292 Times in 213 Posts
    Looks definately like a BR-412.
    As for the date you should look up all markings on your projectile. If you are not sure what you have and see there just post images here.
    The BR-412 should be the earliest model but I do not know till when they were made and when the successors were adopted.
    The suffix letters behind the 412 are not issued in alphabetical order (Cyrillic order is different from Latin anyways). Also keep in mind that the same suffix letter on 2 different projectiles can have different meanings (some piblications do say so wrongly).

  5. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    271
    Thanks
    62
    Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
    P.S.: The BR-412B projectile have ballistic cap, looks different than this.

  6. #5
    Ordnance Approved/Premium Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    94
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
    Hi Rich,

    I have this bit of info on the subjet. Hope this help!..

    Cheers.

    Luc.

    http://english.battlefield.ru/100mm-d-10-tank-gun.html

    BR-412.jpgBR-412B.jpgBR-412D.jpgBR-412D Variant.jpg
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Fr Cdn AT; 10th September 2012 at 05:14 AM.
    Any live or dug ordnance shown in my posts has been dealt with accordingly by EOD personnel

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Fr Cdn AT For This Useful Post:

    rcaf53 (12th September 2012)

  8. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Southampton, UK
    Posts
    366
    Images
    83
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 46 Times in 14 Posts
    Thanks All, especially the pics and link.
    Ill have a look at the projectile again this evening with a magnifying glass, and see if I missed anythign first time !!

    ...just a shame I didnt pickup the second projectile that was for sale, as there were two!.

    Cheers
    Rich

  9. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Budapest, Hungary, Hungary
    Posts
    38
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    As far as i know the "B" suffix denotes first modification while the "D" is second modification.
    The "A" suffix doesn't represent development sequence, it usually means cast iron body

  10. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,786
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 292 Times in 213 Posts
    Vince, often but not always since as said the letters do not have the same meaning on every index they are part of. An often mistaken fact.

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top
Website designed and maintained by Tucanoo Solutions Ltd