Welcome to the Inert Ordnance Collectors.
  • Login:
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27
  1. #1
    Ordnance Approved
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Illinois USA
    Posts
    946
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 331 Times in 171 Posts

    Soviet 9N210 and 9N235 bomblets

    Can anyone tell me the difference between these two and if they might also have a different designation?
    any live or dug ordnance shown in my posts was dealt with by EOD personell

  2. #2
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Ukraine
    Posts
    661
    Thanks
    346
    Thanked 379 Times in 177 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by weberoed View Post
    Can anyone tell me the difference between these two and if they might also have a different designation?
    9Н235 can jump. 9H210 can`t.

  3. #3
    Ordnance Approved
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Illinois USA
    Posts
    946
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 331 Times in 171 Posts
    I've been reading functioning for both and have seen some drawings but can't see any "jump" "eject" "bound" type feature. Can you larify?
    any live or dug ordnance shown in my posts was dealt with by EOD personell

  4. #4
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Ukraine
    Posts
    661
    Thanks
    346
    Thanked 379 Times in 177 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by weberoed View Post
    I've been reading functioning for both and have seen some drawings but can't see any "jump" "eject" "bound" type feature. Can you larify?
    I really not sure that you have seen anywhere 9N235 9N210 isn`t difficult, but 9N235 I haven`t ever seen on any russian language web-site!

  5. #5
    ORDNANCE APPROVED/Premium Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Michigan - US
    Posts
    3,997
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 4,029 Times in 1,164 Posts
    I've documented them in about 4-5 Western EOD collections, I can send photos tonight if nobody shows one today. I've never found a documented answer to this question either.
    All dug or live ordnance shown in my posts is under EOD control and has been or will be dealt with accordingly by EOD personnel

  6. #6
    Ordnance Approved
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Illinois USA
    Posts
    946
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 331 Times in 171 Posts
    thanks Jeff, from what I have been able to find they are the same measurements, and appear very very similiar, the functioning info I get is limited but both appear to be straight impact. I was thinking someone just made a mistake and they were one in the same, photos would be great.
    any live or dug ordnance shown in my posts was dealt with by EOD personell

  7. #7
    ORDNANCE APPROVED/Premium Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Michigan - US
    Posts
    3,997
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 4,029 Times in 1,164 Posts
    235 vs a 210. Some difference in appearance is due to the angle of the photo. Measurements are the same.


    D-O-SUB-RU-075.jpg 9H210.jpg 9H210 a.jpg
    All dug or live ordnance shown in my posts is under EOD control and has been or will be dealt with accordingly by EOD personnel

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to US-Subs For This Useful Post:

    rcaf53 (24th October 2012)

  9. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,627
    Thanks
    31
    Thanked 612 Times in 401 Posts
    Is that "257" in the lot number?

  10. #9
    ORDNANCE APPROVED/Premium Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Michigan - US
    Posts
    3,997
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 4,029 Times in 1,164 Posts
    Looks like it to me. These two are not mine, just from my photo logs. What you see is what you get -
    All dug or live ordnance shown in my posts is under EOD control and has been or will be dealt with accordingly by EOD personnel

  11. #10
    Ordnance Approved
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Illinois USA
    Posts
    946
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 331 Times in 171 Posts
    I just confirmed they are both the same size and though not for sure the functioning appears to be the same too.
    But the 210 has 272 grams of RDX/wax and the 235 has 315 grams RDX/AL (just got an email as I was typing this reply with this info)
    any live or dug ordnance shown in my posts was dealt with by EOD personell

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to weberoed For This Useful Post:

    rcaf53 (24th October 2012)

 

 
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top