Welcome to the Inert Ordnance Collectors.
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Oxfordshire
    Posts
    100
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 66 Times in 22 Posts

    20mm Hispano trials using Madsen AP projectiles.

    The attached picture shows 4 x 20mm Hispano Rounds:


    1. Armoured Piercing Mk 1z - with a sharp pointed tip.


    2. Armoured Piercing experimental using a Madsen projectile with a brass ballistic cap.


    3. Armoured Piercing Mk 2z with a Bakelite ballistic cap unpainted.


    4. Armoured Piercing Mk 2z with a Bakelite ballistic cap painted white.


    I recently obtained examples 1 and 2 from a retired employee of one of our research establishments. According to Peter Labbett’s and Freddy Mead’s ‘British 20mm Hispano Ammunition Technical Ammunition Guide’, the AP Mk 1z with the pointed tip was not accepted for service because it tended to break up in the barrel and had a poor armoured piecing performance.


    The gentleman I got the two rounds from said that this was incorrect and the reason that the MK 1 was rejected was that the sharp pointed nose used to dig into the aluminium of the early circular 60 round magazines when the gun was fired and this caused it to jam. This sounds reasonable as the early Ball and HE versions of the rounds had flat tipped projectiles or fuzes. According to him, to overcome this problem Madsen AP projectiles were trialled with brass ballistic caps fitted. If you look closely you can see that the driving band on round 2 is slightly broader than the normal Hispano round. I have included pictures 3 & 4 to show the AP Mk 2z round which was accepted for service, the cap should normally be painted white, but it is clearer in the unpainted one.


    I have never seen any reference material to support the explanation above, has anyone else? I have put this up on the IAA website but so far have had no additional information.


    Thanks in advance


    Ian



    DSC03400.JPG
    Any live or dug ordnance shown in my posts has been dealt with accordingly by eod personnel

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Buster For This Useful Post:

    charley777 (18th January 2014), rcaf53 (7th January 2014), SG500 (6th January 2014), smle2009 (7th January 2014)

  3. #2
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,753
    Thanks
    511
    Thanked 1,092 Times in 619 Posts
    Ian,

    Is there not anything in O.B. Procs regarding this?

    TimG

  4. #3
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Oxfordshire
    Posts
    100
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 66 Times in 22 Posts
    Tim,

    I do not have immediate access to O.B. Procs and will need to look at them when time permitts. I am being idle and hoping someone else has some information.

    Ian
    Any live or dug ordnance shown in my posts has been dealt with accordingly by eod personnel

  5. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    100
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 32 Times in 24 Posts
    What is 'O.B. Procs'?

  6. #5
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,753
    Thanks
    511
    Thanked 1,092 Times in 619 Posts
    Ordnance Board Proceedings.

    The attached will give you an idea of what they did.

    TimG

    IMG_2042.jpg

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to TimG For This Useful Post:

    Defender (15th January 2014)

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top