US Supreme Court interesting ruling

[sksvlad]

Massachusetts's stun gun ban came into question after a woman was arrested for carrying one in her pursue for protection against her ex-boyfriend. Police arrested her, and a state court upheld the ban, arguing that the Second Amendment was never intended to apply to stun guns.
But the Supreme Court disagreed and reversed that decision Monday. The Second Amendment applies to all firearms, “even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding,” the high court wrote.

 

[pzgr40]

So , in the first place the massachusets court preffered the usage of a lethal weapon over a less than lethal weapon?

 

[HAZORD]

And just so you understand the significance of this action, Massachusetts, California, and New York are all in the running neck-and-neck for who can be the most Communist and anti-gun.

 

[WWIIBuff]

And just so you understand the significance of this action, Massachusetts, California, and New York are all in the running neck-and-neck for who can be the most Communist and anti-gun.

You mean Commifornia don't you? My wonderful home state. Love the beaches, hate the politics.

 

[highlandotter]

you said it. What a wonderful change occurs just over the border with Arizona re weaponry. But the weather is too hot!