Welcome to the Inert Ordnance Collectors.
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    218
    Thanks
    94
    Thanked 60 Times in 33 Posts

    Bomb Identification

    Last edited by khanmak; 25th November 2016 at 06:57 PM.

  2. #2
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,077
    Thanks
    141
    Thanked 186 Times in 110 Posts
    Christ that a big one.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    218
    Thanks
    94
    Thanked 60 Times in 33 Posts
    Looks like it was inert filled?

  4. #4
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    England
    Posts
    252
    Thanks
    96
    Thanked 98 Times in 56 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by khanmak View Post
    Looks like it was inert filled?
    Yes, the news story says it was filled with concrete.

  5. #5
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    3,887
    Thanks
    363
    Thanked 858 Times in 491 Posts
    Whatever it is, it needs repaired and displayed somewhere.
    ___HAZ/
    _____/ORD Hazardous Ordnance Recognition
    ________Saving Lives Through Education

  6. #6
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,300
    Thanks
    280
    Thanked 581 Times in 354 Posts
    12,000 lb Tallboy at a guess.

    TimG

  7. #7
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    kent
    Posts
    1,237
    Images
    4
    Thanks
    346
    Thanked 691 Times in 325 Posts
    I'm going for grand slam as stood next to one comparing with guy next to it

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    218
    Thanks
    94
    Thanked 60 Times in 33 Posts
    Yes - I had about the size of a Tallboy. Dont think its big enough for a Grand Slam. The lug arrangements look British. Looks like it had been deliberately dumped there as the lifting lugs are dead even & central. I expect it will be dumped. Odd find in an odd location!

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to khanmak For This Useful Post:

    millsbomber (28th November 2016)

  10. #9
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    699
    Thanks
    253
    Thanked 522 Times in 264 Posts
    The object in the photos might be a dummy or experimental item, but is neither a Tallboy nor Grand Slam.

    Both Tallboy and Grand Slam were devoid of lifting lugs, and were loaded and held in the aircraft bomb bay by a cradle. Lugs would have caused precession (wobbling) of the bombs as they attained terminal velocity. Even without lugs precession was a problem discovered in early Tallboy trials over the New Forest, and one that Barnes Wallis had to solve before the bombs could be accepted for service.
    Last edited by Snufkin; 26th November 2016 at 05:00 PM.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Snufkin For This Useful Post:

    millsbomber (28th November 2016)

  12. #10
    Premium Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    742
    Thanks
    49
    Thanked 143 Times in 105 Posts
    The wall thickness looks to be too thin for a Tallboy or Grand Slam.

    They were built as very robust bombs to achieve the designed penetration. They also had steel points on the front of the casing.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to glevum For This Useful Post:

    millsbomber (28th November 2016)

 

 
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top