Tony Williams
Well-Known Member
I have just been sent this message by a correspondent:
This doesn't really match up with the info I have included in my article on the m/42 here: http://www.quarry.nildram.co.uk/gustav.htm which is as follows:
My info comes from a letter actually written by Burney, dated 25th November 1943; note that he only refers to seeing drawings, not testing a gun. If he had been working on a 20mm, surely he would have mentioned it then when writing about the m/42. So is Weeks completely wrong about this?
I was just reading "Men Against Tanks" by John Weeks. In it he mentions that Sir Dennis Burney actually made a 20mm recoilless that had a muzzle velocity of 2,850 fps. This was in 1942, and in light of Sir Dennis' comments about the Swedish m/42 in your excellent article, I've become very curious about this matter.
Is it possible that the gun John Weeks is referring to is actually the m/42 that Sir Dennis tested? Or was it really one of Sir Dennis' own designs? Is there a surviving specimen or pic of the gun or ammo?
This doesn't really match up with the info I have included in my article on the m/42 here: http://www.quarry.nildram.co.uk/gustav.htm which is as follows:
A 1943 assessment of factory drawings by no less than Dennis Burney of the Broadway Trust Company (designer of the recoilless Burney guns) estimated a muzzle velocity of 800-820m/s, but it appears that he was assuming a heavier projectile, as most 20mm AT weapons had bullet weights of 130-150g. In fact, the m/42's projectile weight was 108g and the muzzle velocity around 950m/s. The AP shot had a tracer and was known as the slpprj m/42; unusually for an ATR, there was also an impact-fuzed HE projectile known as the sgr m/43.
Burney had some interesting technical comments to make, comparing the design with his own very similar 3.45" recoilless gun. He estimated that the size and shape of the exhaust jet in the breech would limit the recoil absorption to about 80% but that it was capable of improvement and was basically a satisfactory design. Interestingly, he suggests that its main use could be as a sniping weapon.
My info comes from a letter actually written by Burney, dated 25th November 1943; note that he only refers to seeing drawings, not testing a gun. If he had been working on a 20mm, surely he would have mentioned it then when writing about the m/42. So is Weeks completely wrong about this?