Hello Heiko,
As carefully (and painstakingly) crafted in German by e-mail, the GAU-8s used to be one of my main specialties, right up until the point where I started to fully specialise in Japanese ammunition. Ever since, most of the GAU-8s have been traded, but I do have some left. As for the very type you ask about: I used to have some 3-4 specimens over here. Nowadays I've only got one left, with a completely black projectile.
All specimens I had at home were always way too light for the official quoted weight of a service specimen, with true DU penetrator. This intrigued me. I have to look up the exact amounts, but IIRC, the ones I had used to weigh around 175 grams (projectile alone) and the official weight of the projectile (found amongst others in an ATK data sheet I have over here) should be around 475 grams. This intrigued me, so I did quite a bit of research about it, and even wrote to the main ATK developers to ask about this; not surprisingly so their only answer was that it was all classified information, and that they were not allowed to comment.
I did find out that DU is on the US list of restricted goods, making its mere possession illegal. Without access to an X-ray machine, for years I could only guess as to what was inside, if anything. Then, back in 2009, I traded one of my specimens (which looks identical to the one in the picture you showed, but it was equipped with a bright red case) to PzGr40; our 'cutaway man'.

This was when finally some of the puzzles started to get solved: he sectioned the round, and found two things of interest:
#1: the primer of the bright red case was fake (though from the outside you would not be able to tell).
#2: it is equipped with a dummy penetrator, made of regular steel. The dimensions are identical to that of the real one, but it is much lighter. (No, it's not a Tungsten penetrator).
Preliminary conclusion: the specimens that are too light seem to be official factory dummies.
As for the real ones... An acquaintance of mine once had the opportunity to handle one. Weighing it showed the projectile should have the proper weight. He also ran a Geigerteller next to it, but that showed no reaction. Weight is really key to setting these rounds apart. But... there may be other clues too. Two real specimens were seen and both featured different paint schemes from the dummies: a black projectile with a red band, and a bright red painted head of the case. Coincidence? Maybe, maybe not. It's possible that the factory dummies were painted in a distinct way to set them aside from the real thing (not confirmed; just a possibility).
On a general note of interest to this line of ammo, it seems there are (or may be) 3 different main service versions of it:
-PGU-14: early version, with a more ogival projectile (much like the HE specimen in your picture). I've never seen an API one with this shape, so I'm not 100% certain it actually exists, but I think that all 'A' versions were shaped like that, and later as 'B' versions became sharper pointed (though the HE stayed the same, so this may not be correct).
-PGU-14B: DU penetrator, sharp pointed projectile, different ballistics from the 'A' line of rounds.
-PGU-14B: tungsten penetrator, similar shape and ballistics as the DU kind, hence I think the 'B' designation stayed like that, and was not changed to a 'C', that I'm aware of.
As for the transition from DU to Tungsten: the specimens with DU penetrator were heavily used in combat in Operation Desert Storm; surely you will have heard about the "Desert Storm Syndrome" which is attributed to inhalation of splintered DU. Consequently, these rounds became notorious, and under pressure investigation was done to less toxic penetrators. Eventually, Tungsten steel penetrators were developed.
These had a similar weight, but were not incendiary. As for the incendiary part of the DU ones, IIRC it is the DU itself (instead of a separate compound) that has incendiary properties upon splintering, but I'm not sure, so maybe something else was added into the mix?!
Anyway, these are, in prose, the main findings of what I know about them. All the specifics would have to be retrieved from some 2-3 e-mail archives ago, so that may be tough. I can, however, look for some of the things, like the ATK data sheet. I would need some time to do so, so it may take a while before such information is retrieved...
Cheers,
Olaf