Join over 14,000 collectors of inert military ordnance. Get expert identification help for shells, fuzes, grenades, and more — plus access our classifieds marketplace and decades of archived knowledge. Free to register, takes seconds.
by the only picture provided I would say it is a repro - the stampings are not convincing and look like on a few fakes I saw in the past.
Some more good pictures of the extremities would give additional help to be sure. (screw end-cap and connection-piece for the head),
Hi,, there are known fakes with markings very close to this,,and there are originals with this stamp, on the fakes the waff stamp is very poor,,,and the font is different, This
i would say its good but some better images, top collar area and bottom threads please would help clarify 100%
Here some more pics of the stick. The top seems to be replaced and I don`t think it was originaly from this stick. On the bottom are traces of glue, but also 4 `crimping` impressions from the bottom threads. If more pics are needed, let me know!
Close call,,,,,,,if you look at the bottom thread area you will see the little slot that the base thread fits into, most cheapo repro handles i have seen don't have this, the bottom thread just sits snug to the wider part of the handle and does not fit up into the wood. But saying that some very good copies do, depends on how far the manufacturer want to go with the reproduction i gues. It does show traces of glue so it has been worked. if the top collar comes of a picc of the under neath would be good. do you have any other info on where it cam from ?
Hello:
A little late for give my opinion, but I agree 100% original handle. You need a crimped top connector for complet more the handle, as in 1943 no screwed collars were used.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.