What's new
British Ordnance Collectors Network

Join over 14,000 collectors of inert military ordnance. Get expert identification help for shells, fuzes, grenades, and more — plus access our classifieds marketplace and decades of archived knowledge. Free to register, takes seconds.

P.E. No. 2 Half Stick Wrapper

Houndsworth

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I made up some inert replica PE No. 2 for my WW2 British sabotage and special forces display a few years ago. I was just reading the period "Sabotage Pamphlet Mk II" and it says the 1/2 pound Plastic, H.E. cartridges were wrapped in waxed paper. I used brown paper and put wax on it, like others have done. But the 1/4 pound cartridge was supplied in "cellophane covered cartridges." I had made up some half sticks using the paper thinking that was logical but would this be incorrect during WW2? If cellophane, what would a modern equivalent be? Cellophane was a clear, cellulose-based film used for food packaging and cigar wrappers. Still is I guess. So should I use a non-stretchy clear film and make sure my fake PE is yellow?
 
Last edited:
i think the SOE striker boards are wrapped also in this Cellophane

Yes and cellophane was also used to contain the black powder ignition charge in the 1¾ lb. Mk.I & Mk.II Fire-Pots. I have never seen cellophane wrapped sticks of any kind.
Not that they did not exist but I haven´t seen them.
 
Last edited:
S-mine 44 propellant charges that resembled a clear plastic pen full of black powder was made of cellulose. Made it water proof, a problem they had with the early S-mines.
 
Could you use the clear cellophane they use to wrap flowers in, just a thought.
Cheers
Andy
Good idea. I wonder if the cellophane used in the 1940s for these military applications was that thickness? The flower-wrapping film I have used is pretty stiff.
 
Good idea. I wonder if the cellophane used in the 1940s for these military applications was that thickness? The flower-wrapping film I have used is pretty stiff.
The ones I have encountered were very thin and brittle. Maybe the brittle part was due to old age.
 
Top