the last is a comparison of the V40 (R) with the new General Dynamics mini grenade. Does anyone have the official designation for this piece yet? Not shown is of course the MN45s and the V60.
Wow, I have to get one of those V40 grenades as in the pics I have seen I had no idea they were so small. How cool is that, as it is no bigger than a large "superball" from when I was a youngster.....Dano
Superball - a Wham-O product from 60's n such
Was that the old M545 or is the newer supposed replacement for the M67 that keeps coming up and dying?
I am being totaly honest when I say that very idea was thought about during TET 68'. Some high ranking Officer from SAC wanted to get over 1,000,000 Wham-O Superballs and dump them on Haiphong Harbor. The news source was Air Force magazine back then. So Dano1917, you were almost there
Thanks for that. How easy are inert ones to get? They are interesting as they are so small. Even though I usually collect British ammunition, I would buy one of these grenades at the right price.How effective is the V40? Obviously a larger, normal type grenade has more explosive and more fragmentation. But as noted earlier, with exception to the fuze well and perhaps fragmentation design, the body of the V40 is virtually identical to the fragmentation ball of the standard 40mm rifle grenade. The 40mm has been copied by virtually every country in NATO, and a number of countries outside of NATO, with millions produced and used in training and combat.
The greatest virtue of the V40 was seen as its size, which enabled the user to carry many more and throw them virtually like a golf ball. It was never, to my knowledge, issued to general troops, but used for Spec Ops - SEALs, SOG, etc. Another tool to put in the box and use when most effective.
As to the superball story, it sounds like a story told over beers, not something seriously considered. I'd really want to see a strong reference on that one before I would give it much credibility.