What's new
British Ordnance Collectors Network

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Unknown projectile, at least to me

weberoed

Well-Known Member
Ordnance approved
Looking for ID on this projectile. was located in North Carolina USA. Some say 3.7", some say german. I am at a loose
 

Attachments

  • 409202004_10228650219133991_7728314541273443845_n.jpg
    409202004_10228650219133991_7728314541273443845_n.jpg
    247 KB · Views: 77
  • 409124904_10228650218973987_4604167760905268_n.jpg
    409124904_10228650218973987_4604167760905268_n.jpg
    290.4 KB · Views: 76
Mike, it appears to be a US Navy design that never went too far. I've seen several more since finding mine some years ago. Stamped markings are on the ogive, using EX numbers.
 
@US-Subs

What was the 3"/70 projectile the US used? Your picture below shows three types, the third from the left appears to the design used by the British and Canadian and has only one forward band. The second from left, which has two forward bands and for all intents looks like a scaled down 3.7" Mk 6, I thought had been identified as the US version. The 'EX' stampings, on account of the visible remains of red paint, I thought came from the first projectile with no forward band.

probert.jpeg

TimG
 
Can either Tim G or US-Subs pse tell me what the nose cone front left of the main pic belongs to.
Sorry to crash this thread with an unconnected request.
Alan1
 
Can either Tim G or US-Subs pse tell me what the nose cone front left of the main pic belongs to.
Sorry to crash this thread with an unconnected request.
Alan1
I'll jump in and say it appears to be a fuze cover/protector for a very large caliber (16"?) projectile. Looks naval.
 
The two left projectiles are both EX marked, but the one in question (#2) was at one time either chromed or otherwise treated and is mostly impossible to read. The third from the left is identified with a MK number. Slick is correct on the cap, they fit well on 6-inch and 8-inch rounds. All part of the Navy section.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0755.jpg
    IMG_0755.jpg
    955 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG_0756.jpg
    IMG_0756.jpg
    970.4 KB · Views: 29
  • IMG_0754.jpg
    IMG_0754.jpg
    895.4 KB · Views: 29
  • IMG_0761.jpg
    IMG_0761.jpg
    795.9 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG_0763.jpg
    IMG_0763.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 34
  • IMG_0757.jpg
    IMG_0757.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 35
  • IMG_0759.jpg
    IMG_0759.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 37
  • IMG_0760.jpg
    IMG_0760.jpg
    1.7 MB · Views: 37
@US-Subs
Thank you, that clears that up. It would appear then, that the US used the same or a very similar projectile to the UK/Canadian design.
 
Thanks, gents, much appreciate yr help. Nose cap came in with a load of ordnance items, but I was not able to identify it . Sadly, it didn't come complete with shell!
Alan1
 
Provided by Vince Strak and other resources.
 

Attachments

  • British 6-Pound Experimental AA Gun HE Shell.PNG
    British 6-Pound Experimental AA Gun HE Shell.PNG
    1.1 MB · Views: 43
  • 37HV_DRILL.jpg
    37HV_DRILL.jpg
    69.1 KB · Views: 41
  • 37HV_HE1.jpg
    37HV_HE1.jpg
    70.3 KB · Views: 38
  • 37HV_HE2.jpg
    37HV_HE2.jpg
    75.2 KB · Views: 34
  • 37HV_Pg2.jpg
    37HV_Pg2.jpg
    62.8 KB · Views: 35
  • 37HV_PRAC.jpg
    37HV_PRAC.jpg
    75.3 KB · Views: 37
  • 37HV_SPECIMENS.jpg
    37HV_SPECIMENS.jpg
    46.5 KB · Views: 39
Top