What's new
British Ordnance Collectors Network

Join over 14,000 collectors of inert military ordnance. Get expert identification help for shells, fuzes, grenades, and more — plus access our classifieds marketplace and decades of archived knowledge. Free to register, takes seconds.

90mm M7H SHELL HE GREGSON &MONK LTD PRESTON

hangarman

Well-Known Member
Have found a box marked up 90mm M7H SHELL HE GREGSON & MONK LTD PRESTON
What does it mean?
Have done a google on Gregson and Monk and they made machinery, mainly for the weaving industry but no mention of Ammunition.
Any ideas?
Cheers
Gary
 
Gary,

I have G & M - Gregson & Monk, Preston, shown as contractors for shell manufacture. What period is the box?

TimG
 
Gregson and Monk ( G & M) of Vulcan Iron Works, Preston are down as being pre-WWI iron founders and engineers, and loom makers machinists. During WWI they made 18-pdr HE shells. They made artillery shells in WWII but I don't know what types - 90 mm looks a distinct possibility from what's marked on your box...


* TimG just pipped me to the post.



Tom.
 
Gary,

It is a little unusual. As far as I can ascertain the only people to use the 90 mm were the Americans and the Canadians and I can't find any examples of the latter using them. Furthermore, it was fixed ammunition. I think the marking is meant to be 90 mm M71 shell.

TimG
 
Found this thread searching for Gregson & Monk Ltd., Preston as I've just purchased this 90mm Shell Box.

IMG_20220714_142650.jpgIMG_20220714_142657.jpgIMG_20220714_142726.jpgIMG_20220714_142747.jpgIMG_20220714_142812.jpg

Thinking it was WW2 with a British manufacturer making US 90mm shells.
The paper label 90mm M313, Shell Smoke, manufacturer, LOT ? yellow rectangle 7 broad arrow.
This has stuck over a stamp 90mm Shell Lot ? with the rest covered.
After a clean on the other side is ROFW 1953 with RO? above.
There is a K stamped into the wood on one end.
Only a small box. about 13" by 9 1/2" internal.
No lid and what's left of a rusty hinge?

Where we still making US shells in 1953? Could this be WW2 then reused with a new label?

Any help appreciated.
 
Top