This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
This drawing originated in the Armament Research Department (ARD). ARD was responsible for a considerable amount of enemy ammunition exploitation during and after the war.
Not yet Tim. I thought I would go through some old HEC reports to see if I could find the answer. I thought it could be to do with filling the vortex behind a shell (which causes drag) to improve velocity but the extra weight involved in the attachment would surely offset any benefits.
I think there are two reasons for such attachment:
Reducing drag in flight, just like You wrote, and increasing the area of the bottom, area x pressure = force = velocity.
I can't imagine what pain it would be for mass production.
Being handed that drawing is sure to run any machinist's day.
Not to mention, that would be extremely expensive to produce for any possible benefits gained. If it really worked, I suppose all projectiles today would have them.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.