What's new
British Ordnance Collectors Network

Join over 14,000 collectors of inert military ordnance. Get expert identification help for shells, fuzes, grenades, and more — plus access our classifieds marketplace and decades of archived knowledge. Free to register, takes seconds.

ID of 40mm Bofors shell

Interesting.....

Having a close look - there appears to be 2 distinct styles of chisel markings:

1) "VIII T" - narrower and in a straight line alignment
2) "X I" - these are broader /wider and sloppy - there is a distinct bias where one end of the chisel has been struck down at an angle - this style aligns with the other cross-out chisel marks & the big "P".

IMHO - (2) above was performed by the same bloke and not the original marker....... "X" marks the spot!
 
Last edited:
Having a close look - there appears to be 2 distinct styles of chisel markings:

1) "VIII T" - narrower and in a straight line alignment
2) "X I" - these are broader /wider and sloppy - there is a distinct bias where one end of the chisel has been struck down at an angle - this style aligns with the other cross-out chisel marks & the big "P".

I agree with your observations.

So if the Mk VIII stamp is likely a manufacturing error, is my shell a Mk II? What would converting it from an HE to a practice shell entail?
 
So if the Mk VIII stamp is likely a manufacturing error, is my shell a Mk II? What would converting it from an HE to a practice shell entail?

Yes, with a 1944 date your shell is almost certainly a Mk IIT.
My understanding is that the difference between Bofors HE and Practice shells was pretty much only the filling and the black colour scheme.
 

Attachments

  • 3A1E5EF5-E2C1-475E-B8D1-0BF3FEA26F6A.jpeg
    3A1E5EF5-E2C1-475E-B8D1-0BF3FEA26F6A.jpeg
    62.2 KB · Views: 19
  • C4715583-E2F9-42F8-9387-8EC8F55A69DD.jpeg
    C4715583-E2F9-42F8-9387-8EC8F55A69DD.jpeg
    45.8 KB · Views: 15
Thanks for all the info. I wonder if there are any other Mk VIII marked shells out there in collector land?

It’s currently sitting in a British 1939 dated case as I happen to have one. I shall keep an eye out for a more suitable 1944 dated one.
 
Yes, with a 1944 date your shell is almost certainly a Mk IIT.

So I gather these markings were normally "rolled' onto the projectile(?) {I remember seeing a u-tube video on how this was done, not specifically for projectiles, but on pipe bars etc}

If so, then there may be a batch of "Mk VIII T" out there (1944 dated)?

If not, then your projectile is quite unique - like stamp collecting where postage mark "mistakes" are highly sought after! :xd:
 
Top