What's new
British Ordnance Collectors Network

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

ID of 40mm Bofors shell

Interesting.....

Having a close look - there appears to be 2 distinct styles of chisel markings:

1) "VIII T" - narrower and in a straight line alignment
2) "X I" - these are broader /wider and sloppy - there is a distinct bias where one end of the chisel has been struck down at an angle - this style aligns with the other cross-out chisel marks & the big "P".

IMHO - (2) above was performed by the same bloke and not the original marker....... "X" marks the spot!
 
Last edited:
Having a close look - there appears to be 2 distinct styles of chisel markings:

1) "VIII T" - narrower and in a straight line alignment
2) "X I" - these are broader /wider and sloppy - there is a distinct bias where one end of the chisel has been struck down at an angle - this style aligns with the other cross-out chisel marks & the big "P".

I agree with your observations.

So if the Mk VIII stamp is likely a manufacturing error, is my shell a Mk II? What would converting it from an HE to a practice shell entail?
 
So if the Mk VIII stamp is likely a manufacturing error, is my shell a Mk II? What would converting it from an HE to a practice shell entail?

Yes, with a 1944 date your shell is almost certainly a Mk IIT.
My understanding is that the difference between Bofors HE and Practice shells was pretty much only the filling and the black colour scheme.
 

Attachments

  • 3A1E5EF5-E2C1-475E-B8D1-0BF3FEA26F6A.jpeg
    3A1E5EF5-E2C1-475E-B8D1-0BF3FEA26F6A.jpeg
    62.2 KB · Views: 19
  • C4715583-E2F9-42F8-9387-8EC8F55A69DD.jpeg
    C4715583-E2F9-42F8-9387-8EC8F55A69DD.jpeg
    45.8 KB · Views: 15
Thanks for all the info. I wonder if there are any other Mk VIII marked shells out there in collector land?

It’s currently sitting in a British 1939 dated case as I happen to have one. I shall keep an eye out for a more suitable 1944 dated one.
 
Yes, with a 1944 date your shell is almost certainly a Mk IIT.

So I gather these markings were normally "rolled' onto the projectile(?) {I remember seeing a u-tube video on how this was done, not specifically for projectiles, but on pipe bars etc}

If so, then there may be a batch of "Mk VIII T" out there (1944 dated)?

If not, then your projectile is quite unique - like stamp collecting where postage mark "mistakes" are highly sought after! :xd:
 
Top