What's new
British Ordnance Collectors Network

Join over 14,000 collectors of inert military ordnance. Get expert identification help for shells, fuzes, grenades, and more — plus access our classifieds marketplace and decades of archived knowledge. Free to register, takes seconds.

Identification assistance

0313, 0315 : French fuze "24/31 Peuch-Remondy Mle 1916 (P.R.)"
0318 : French fuze "FUSEE DETONATEUR PERCUTANTE DE 24/31 T.C.A.L. Mle 1926, LEFEVRE"
Thanks, any difference between the small and large openings on the face?
 
Here are the French/clones that I was referring to, new pieces that I'm working on now. Some have nomenclature, but without references is can be difficult to determine which part of that nomenclature is actually the model number.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0324.jpg
    IMG_0324.jpg
    3 MB · Views: 13
Two more fuzes - the first I recognize as from the Swedish 37mm APHE but I don't have a model number of the fuze. The second is confusing without a manual. Searching online I can find a photo of the fuze from one of the US published guidebooks, but while the fuze appears to me to be an Italian BPD, they have the same fuze and nomenclature shown but identify it as a PDB 122. Searching for BPD 122 Cat-UXO shows a fuze that has similar construction, but is actually marked as PDB.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0326.jpg
    IMG_0326.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 18
  • IMG_0325.jpg
    IMG_0325.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 18
Here are the French/clones that I was referring to, new pieces that I'm working on now. Some have nomenclature, but without references is can be difficult to determine which part of that nomenclature is actually the model number.
MZ62 in the middle is probably Swiss.
M45 (cyrillic) on the right is former Yugoslavia
 
Here is another. I can make out 1-2 random stamped numbers, but nothing that looks like a nomenclature. The lower portions look very US to me. There are a few hand drawn characters, a with a little imagination perhaps an anchor in a circle. Oddly, the window with the wires looks like part of the construction, not like a cut away.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0343.jpg
    IMG_0343.jpg
    2.7 MB · Views: 3
  • IMG_0344.jpg
    IMG_0344.jpg
    2.7 MB · Views: 3
  • IMG_0345.jpg
    IMG_0345.jpg
    2.4 MB · Views: 3
  • IMG_0346.jpg
    IMG_0346.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 3
That is what I believe, but it does not explain the confusion in the online sources, nor give me a model.
I've not personally looked at that fuze, and have no local (in the office) example to check it's markings. Unfortunately I have found many online sources just repeat, parrot fashion, what is present in certain sources. Examples sources being the Afghanistan and Iraq 2004 EOD guides, the 1997 DIA 'Worldwide Fuze Identification Guide', and the former 'Jane's' publications. Unfortunate these guides and books, like all intelligence and reference materials, have errors in them. The skill is having a large enough personal knowledge base to spot such errors, and correct them. Many of these online sources seeming don't have this personal knowledge base.
 
Top