What's new
British Ordnance Collectors Network

Join over 14,000 collectors of inert military ordnance. Get expert identification help for shells, fuzes, grenades, and more — plus access our classifieds marketplace and decades of archived knowledge. Free to register, takes seconds.

Pomz ?

Hi jlt1987,
I would say it looks Vietnamese at a guess, but will wait for conformation from the experts on this one, Best regards Weasel.
 
This is a WW2 Italian V-1 stake mine. This one is missing the top, which was a simple screw-on lid with a fuze well. It used the same push/pull fuzes as in their type R and RM box mines. The fuzes looked different, but functioned the same as the German ZZ42 and the Russian MUV.
 
Ewag has got it right. Mine came with a couple of small spools of wire hanging off the fuze.
 
I didn't know there was a postwar model. How can you tell the difference between a "V" and a "V-1"?
 
Of course evag2,


You can see the differences between the "V. 1" (1941) and the "V" (1950) from these general layout pictures.

MinaV.1_02.jpgModelloV_02.jpg

Then I can list the main differences between the models:

1 - The firing devices, integral in "V. 1" and too (and uselessly) complex vs. the simple "Model R" tripwire fuze used by "Mina V";

MinaV.1_13.gifAccenditoreR_01.jpgAccenditoreR_08.gif

2 - The fragmentation body, a metallic pipe wrapped in a spiral of square (4x4 mm) iron wire for "V. 1" and cilindrical serrated cast iron body for "V";

MinaV.1_06.jpgModelloV_09.jpg

3 - The wooden picket, entirely cilindrical for "V. 1" and pointed for "V".

There are other minor differences, such as the firing chain or the safety system, but I can say that the only common component between the two model of landmines is the charge, a cilindrical 100 g TNT cartridge No. 4.

@jlt1987 the missing top piece:

ModelloVex_03.jpg

Regards
Stecol
 
Thank you, Stecol, for your detailed and informative answer.

Best regards,
Rob
 
Top