What's new
British Ordnance Collectors Network

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

'W' Bombs

Antoon

Well-Known Member
Ordnance approved
Formerly a underwater weapon, but by the RAF categorized under aircraft bombs, so therefore placed here.

Towards the end of 1939, a Plan known as W.A.16, with the code name 'Royal Marine ', was devised by the War Cabinet with the object of reducing Germany's inland waterway traffic to the maximum possible extent by laying mines from aircraft. The mines were the so called ‘W’ (Water) bombs and as far as I know 3 Marks were produced.

The Mark I was made up of a cylindrical casing of 10 inches diameter and 15 inches long, filled with a charge of 20 lb. TNT , the total weight being 35 lb. The mine had a negative buoyancy, and to it were attached by lines, a number of cork floats. These corks were contained in a small chamber at the top of the bomb, which also contained the firing device-a number of wires arranged like the ribs of an umbrella. These were held together by a lid which also retained the corks but were arranged so that, on the removal of the lid they opened out radially, forming a number of projecting ' whiskers ‘. Two delay devices in the form of soluble plugs were fitted: the first, after two or three minutes in the water, freed the lid, releasing the contact wires and corks which then held the bomb suspended at a depth of some 3 feet and free to float with the current of the stream. The second was intended - to sink the mine after a lapse of 6, 18 or f48 hours (according to the type of plug fitted), so that it became inoperative in neutral waters. This type was intended for use in rivers. The German name for this mine was Flußmine 480 (e).

For the still waters of canals, a Mark II pattern was designed in which the corks were attached directly to the mine. At the bottom was a 5 lb. sinker and 6 feet of mooring cable. After entry the sinker was freed by a soluble plug, and moored the mine 6 feet from the bottom. As the average depth of a canal was 9 feet, it was thus held some 3 feet from the surface.

A third type (Mark III) was intended to destroy pontoon bridges, whose draught is about 1 foot. The Mark III mine, by means of directly attached corks, floated just below the surface, and was intended to drift into contact with the bridge. In all Marks, any contact with the radial wires completed an electric circuit supplied by a small battery, firing an electric detonator and the main charge. All bombs were fitted with a small drogue, designed by the Royal Engineers and Signals Board, to check their impact.

But in the German Bomb Disposal Handbook Belerungsblattern über Beseitigung feindlicher Abwurfmunition Blatt 1 und 2 is mentioned a larger model named Englische Flugzeugtreibmine ELMT 10 with a content of 10 kg TNT that looks like the Mark I but is 480 mm (18.89 inch) in diameter en 620 mm (24.4 inch) long. The picture is the same as the Flußmine 480 (e) that is mentioned in the German manual D553, Englische Flugzeugtreibmine.

Is the larger version a Mark IV, or is the info in the German Bomb Disposal Handbook wrong?

I am also looking for the complete photo with a 'W" bomb on the Dutch beach at Scheveningen with the German soldier leaning over it and police officers of The Hague (looks like Bobbies) standing near it.

Greetings - Antoon

03.jpg



tempImageHWvst7.jpgtempImager6wTUX.jpgtempImageYf2lud.jpgtempImager5J1sw.jpg
 
The origin of the ' W ' bomb is somewhat obscure. Its design appears first of all to have been considered by Major Jeffris of the War Office but investigation leads to the conclusion that some of the credit for the design must go to Mr. Midgley of Messrs. Midgley Harmer, builders of pipeless organs and also bomb fuzes etc. The problem seems to have been discussed between Major Jeffris and a Mr. A.M. Low. Low turned to Midgley in October 1939. In a few days Midgley had produced a small bomb weighing 3 lb., of simple design and equipped with a radial 'spider ' of wires, rather like the ribs of an umbrella, which, ordinarily compressed, when released, sprang out and acted as sensitive contacts through which an electric circuit could be closed to detonate the bomb-a principle which persisted throughout the development of the weapon.
On 28 November 1939, a Conference was called at the Offices of the Ordnance Board to discuss the design of the bomb, then a matter' of great urgency, with Group Captain Huskinson, RA.F. representative on the Board, in the chair. The design suggested by Midgley, which had by this time been made up at Woolwich, Major Jeffris having supplied the drawings, was discussed and various modifications suggested. Arrangements were made for R.A.E. to investigate the carrier problem and static and dropping trials were arranged.

The weight of explosive was at first undetermined. In November 1939 trials by H.M.S. Venon, against dummy lighters, showed that the charge to be effective should not be less than 8 lb . In December, further experiments against a loaded barge showed that a weight of 8 lb. was insufficient , and that the minimum charge should be 20 lb.
This meant a re-de.sign, the dimensions of which were increased to 10 inches diameter and 16 inches length; the total weight was estimated as 30-35 lb. Experiments on soluble plugs were put in hand both by the Admiralty and by C.S.R.D. Woolwich, all work on the original small bomb was stopped, and the development of the larger bomb commenced. By 11 December, various other refinements in the design had been considered, such as an arrangement of cork floats to keep the bomb out of sight just below the surface, and a sinking device which would, after an interval, allow the bomb to rise.

On 29 December 1939, at a meeting held at the Air Ministry, with Air Vice-Marshal Tedder in the Chair, attended by representatives from the Ordnance Board, Directorate of Armament Development and the Directorate of Armament Production, Messrs. Midgley Harmer were given the contract for ten thousand bombs a,nd containers. 2 Full working drawings of the bomb were completed by 13 January, and production had commenced by 3 March.
 
Last edited:
The Air Historical Branch talks in there document S.D. 719, about the RAF in WW2, Bombs and bombing equipment about
Major Jeffris of the War Office, but possible is this the same Major Jefferis from MD 1.
 
Found the picture on the site of the The Hague Municipal Archives. ID number HGA001900438.
 

Attachments

  • NL-HaHGA_8112-01_HGA001900438.jpg
    NL-HaHGA_8112-01_HGA001900438.jpg
    105.5 KB · Views: 25
Albert Midgley began his armaments career at CAV with Charles Anthony Vandervell. Pre war he had been designing electrics for car manufacturers including dynamos and lighting.

In November 1917 they submitted patent No. 119,329 for the Allways fuze that was first used in the Stokes mortar. Midgley was seconded to the Ministry of Munitions Design Department. In 1921 Midgley and Vandervell were awarded £14,000 for their design work.

In WW2 he designed the fuze for the Barnes Wallis Tallboy bomb and a total of 72 fuze designs during the war. He claimed his fuzes had been fitted to 200 million bombs .

He died in 1961 with over 200 patents to his name covering the motor industry, musical instruments and armaments. He is an unsung hero of British manufacturing.
 
Last edited:
Top