What's new
British Ordnance Collectors Network

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WW1 Newton rifle grenade (pippin?)

gedmat

Member
Does anyone have any images of a Newton rifle grenade or explanation of how the device operated etc anything appreciated
 
Pippin

Here are a couple of drawings. I also have an Eley drawing of the .303 discharger cartridge for the Newton (when I can find it!)

Regards
TonyE
 

Attachments

  • Pippin1.jpg
    Pippin1.jpg
    58.9 KB · Views: 47
  • Pippin2.jpg
    Pippin2.jpg
    57.4 KB · Views: 53
Newton

Does anyone have any images of a Newton rifle grenade or explanation of how the device operated etc anything appreciated

Another image showing rod. Basically the hand version with a rod. This was developed into a more efficient version in the Army Workshops (drawing No22 Workshop) which worked very well. Was chosen for home production and messed about with such the grenade functioned at the end of the barrel - not helpful. A Mark II rectified the problem and a Mark III was devised (see dwg) but enthusiasm for this sort of design had waned by then.
 

Attachments

  • NewtonPippinRifle.jpg
    NewtonPippinRifle.jpg
    60.1 KB · Views: 29
  • No22Workshop.pdf
    36.9 KB · Views: 51
  • No22MkIII.pdf
    38.4 KB · Views: 42
Norman,

Any idea why the dimensions are metric?

(Just noticed that Tony's is metric as well)

Regards

TimG
 
Norman,

Any idea why the dimensions are metric?

(Just noticed that Tony's is metric as well)

Regards

TimG


Tony's drawing shows the 'automatic' lighter for the Pippin. Both of the drawings originate from the Army Workshops in France and, although I have not paid much attention to it before, I guess that metric dimensions would have been a must for work put out to French foundries etc., and presumably locally sourced workshop kit would have been metric. I'll see if I have anything that mentions it.

Afternote: From a small sample of drawings it would seem that 1st Army Workshops used imperial measurement, 2nd Army Workshops conducted their business in metric (maybe they employed French Draughtsmen!) and The Experimental Section used both (or perhaps I should say either).
 
Last edited:
Top