What's new
British Ordnance Collectors Network

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

No 20 Mk 1 & Mk 2 ?

GrahamMk5

Member
I recently bought the two components of 'Hales Mk 1 and Mk 2' grenades. I think they are parts of No. 20 grenades obviously after detonation. One has a complete needle pellet rammed into its creep spring and its guide tube. The other has only part of the needle pellet. They were marked Mk.1 & Mk.2. The only difference I understand from Rick Landers' book between the two Mks are the steel bodies. The max diameters of my two examples are: one 1 1/4" (32mm) and the second one 1 1/8th" (28mm) - this seems the only difference. Any comments/corrections would be appreciated.
(Sorry about the size of the picture - how do I make it bigger?)
Mk 20 2.jpg
 
Graham . There's actually a lot of difference . The Mk2 has a much wider aperture in the base but a smaller one for the det. holder in the top . The No20 Mk1 is very similar to a No3 Mk2 & most parts are interchangeable . Hope this helps .
 
Graham. Yes , the Mk2 body is basically a straight tube with external grooves that's threaded internally the same at both ends so you could , in theory , screw the det holder or the base piece in either end . The Mk1 has a tapered base & a rebate turned into the top so the det holder only screws in so far & is therefore wider than the Mk2 & the parts can't be interchanged .
 
Thank you again Siegreid, that makes it all much clearer to me.
On a point of interest in my Mk2 example the retaining bolt holes in the base piece have been deformed to become oval in shape, I assume, due to the impact and subsequent explosion. Might have hit a hard surface at the end of its 'flight'?
 
Graham . Unlikely . That sort of damage is normally caused when the grenade has been destroyed whilst complete & unfired . This could either be when a weapons store was hit during combat or , more likely , when they were destroyed by an EOD team after being deemed obsolete . If it had been fired , the retaining bolts would have dropped out in flight to allow the needle pellet to move forward & strike the detonator . Damage to the retaining bolt holes usually only occurs if the grenade has been blown up complete as this forces the striker rearwards shattering the bolts & distorting the holes . If they were found in the UK , this is most likely the cause [EOD] , if they were found in Europe then they were probably destroyed in a weapons store explosion .
 
Top