What's new
British Ordnance Collectors Network

Join over 14,000 collectors of inert military ordnance. Get expert identification help for shells, fuzes, grenades, and more — plus access our classifieds marketplace and decades of archived knowledge. Free to register, takes seconds.

No100 a strange fuze

lcn

Well-Known Member
[FONT=&quot]Hi[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I need help[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]This concerns the English fuze No100[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I have 4 drawings [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The first comes from Notes one to ammuntion for QF 13 pr and QF 18 pr 1916 HMSO[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Second comes from Factory of Artillery Ammunitions - American Machinist on 1916[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The third is a document of the German services of Dberitz loaded with expertise on the chemical ammunitions on 1918 [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]And the fourth of a Russian book[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Here is my problem[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]On the first it is just mentioned only one needle and a one detonator And nothing on the upper party of graze pellet .[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
URL]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]On the second on the contrary it is mentioned well by two percuteurs and of two detonators (e and f)[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
URL]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]On the third they guess a second detonator but without explanation.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
URL]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]And the fourth resembles No1[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
URL]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Where is true No100?[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Would it be different Mk I Mk II A or B, of special mark (for chemical munition) ?[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Thanks in advance...[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Regards[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Jean Paul[/FONT]
 
Hello

I'm also very interesting with the question.

no one can answer ? The 100 fuze seems very usual, insn't it ?
 
Top