What's new
British Ordnance Collectors Network

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Shrapnel Fuse Identification

On a recent walk on Fleetwood beach I found the following items which I believe are parts from a shrapnel shell circa 1880’s. The 2 larger brass parts have RL marking which I think indicates Royal Laboratory Woolwich. I also believe the markings 10/90 and 3/81 are the dates when either the part was made or recalibrated, can anybody confirm this or not. Plus what are the parts. The shrapnel ball is 25g and is metric 16.7mm diameter. I believe the 2 larger brass parts are part of the timing fuse used for artillery shells, but I’m not sure of this. Can anybody confirm what’s these parts are and were they all part of the same shell. Plus on a safety note is the timing fuse still armed?
 
The first (RL II) is : fuze percussion Royal Laboratory Plain Mark II (N° 7)
No idea for the second (larger piece). Something like gaine adapter.
 
Last edited:
The first (RL II) is : fuze percussion Royal Laboratory Plain Mark II (N° 7)
No idea for the second (larger piece). Something like gaine adapter.
Thanks for that, so it’s definitely part of a percussion fuze and not a timer?. Plus have got got any further info. on the percussion fuze eg drawings or manual?
 
 
This exact percussion fuze was also used by Romania for our Armstrong 63mm (2.5-in) Model 1883 mountain guns. It was known as "Percussion Fuze model 1881".
It's interesting to note that there are a few differences between the British RL II, the m.1881 as it appears in the manual and ground-dug versions, namely the RL fuze has a big square cutout, the Romanian manual version has a big round cutout, whereas the ground-dug version dispenses with the cutout altogether and has a small plug over the hole through which the firing pin has been inserted into the body of the fuze.
 

Attachments

  • RL_Percussion_Fuze_Diagrams_1877.jpg
    RL_Percussion_Fuze_Diagrams_1877.jpg
    183.9 KB · Views: 59
  • Focos percutie 63mm_m1881_1000.jpg
    Focos percutie 63mm_m1881_1000.jpg
    537.8 KB · Views: 63
  • 135463585_451647609193887_2037075185628335370_n.jpg
    135463585_451647609193887_2037075185628335370_n.jpg
    684 KB · Views: 57
  • 136946623_217600136777751_5316023012581610338_n.jpg
    136946623_217600136777751_5316023012581610338_n.jpg
    300.3 KB · Views: 51
  • 136729125_447726786595871_6562366024696233667_n.jpg
    136729125_447726786595871_6562366024696233667_n.jpg
    599.6 KB · Views: 56
Last edited:
This exact percussion fuze was also used by Romania for our Armstrong 63mm (2.5-in) Model 1883 mountain guns. It was known as "Percussion Fuze model 1881".
It's interesting to note that there are a few differences between the British RL II, the m.1881 as it appears in the manual and ground-dug versions, namely the RL fuze has a big square cutout, the Romanian manual version has a big round cutout, whereas the ground-dug version dispenses with the cutout altogether and has a small plug over the hole through which the firing pin has been inserted into the body of the fuze.
The dug fuze that you show looks more like the Armstrong Bolt percussion fuze on the british fuze list as No 1
 
The dug fuze that you show looks more like the Armstrong Bolt percussion fuze on the british fuze list as No 1
Do you have any pictures of the Armstrong Bolt Percussion fuze?

All I could find is a cutaway, which suggests that the internal arrangement on an Armstrong is different than that of the RL Mk.II.

What we have is, internally, definitely the latter, just without the square hole in the top that the British version has.
The way the hole is drawn in the Romanian manual might suggest ours had a round hole intially, but all the ones we've ever found have no hole at all, so it might be that's an error which slipped in when someone dupicated the original Armstrong drawing for the manual and assumed the hole on top must be round, because he's never seen the actual fuze, just the drawing he was copying.

Speaking of which, I assume the only reason to have it is to tighten the fuze down onto the shell and I have no idea how we did it. I mean, there is a small cylindical hole opposite the big one through which the safety wire is inserted so I'm assuming we used a "J" wrench, but I have no definite proof that is the case.
And the fact we have a fuze lacking the hole and a date of 1884 would suggest that is a modification made by Armstrong themselves and not somethign we did later in Romania.
 
Last edited:
Top